Friday, 24 October 2014

I sent this letter to the Nurses Association of NSW and requested an interview for their comments

Hello,

I am an Australian living on the central coast (Near Gosford) and I have a radio show in the USA which is also global and there has been a lot of discussion about Ebola recently.  I have been looking into the transmission vectors for the virus and suspect it to be able to be inhaled in aerosol form and there seems to be a difference between what is being said publically by the CDC and what is contained on their own website and other research results.

After observing the increasing groundswell on this topic in the worldwide scientific community I would appreciate an interview with an official from your organization please.

This request comes from the alarming quantity of Carers, doctors and medical professionals who are becoming infected despite training, processes, and in some cases where it has been a life career in HFV’s.  It is high infection rate for a disease which is stated as only “on direct contact” with infected materials and which should be easily manageable.

Image 24th October 2014 shows only Carers, doctors and Medical Professionals


The following are what I would like comments on.


Researchers at the University of Illinois School of Public Health
“But this “reflects an incorrect and outmoded understanding of infectious aerosols… virus-laden bodily fluids may be aerosolized and inhaled while a person is in proximity to an infectious person,” they wrote.”


The CDC website has 2 curious pieces of information which contradict their own public announcements of it being “contact only” and another, that Ebola is transdermal.


1.
CDC Ebola Guidance for Airlines – search page for “droplets”
“Do NOT use compressed air, pressurized water or similar procedures, which might create droplets of infectious materials.”
2.
CDC Telebriefing on Ebola outbreak in west Africa (52 minutes in) either listen, read or search page for “Unbroken”

“JACOB WARD: If I could follow up quick, the direct contact, if you could define direct contact.  That truly means you're physically touch it, not in the same room with it or with the bodily secretions or anything like that, it's actually having to touch it? 
STEPHAN MONROE: That’s correct. Touching it and introducing it through some sort of mucus membrane or unbroken skin, a cut on the skin, something like that. 

JACOB WARD: Great, thank you. “

No comments :

Post a Comment